Tag Archives: The Clansman

The Thomas Dixon Studios – Hollywood

Screen Shot 2014-10-04 at 9.04.13 AMI have just recently learned that novelist, minister, lecturer, and all-around swell egg Thomas Dixon, Jr. threw his hat in the movie business ring early in the 20th century. You will most likely  remember Dixon from some of his overly sentimentalized and virulently racist depictions of the old South, the Civil War, and Reconstruction in such novels as The Leopard’s Spots and The Clansman. Well, D. W. Griffith’s film adaptation of these books – The Birth of a Nation – was so immeasurably popular (and simultaneously controversial) when it debuted in 1915 that Dixon thought he might cash in on the film’s success and make some movies of his own.

This was news to me. But it turns Dixon set up shop down the street from my house. Yes indeed friends, I drive by the former location of the Dixon Studios, Hollywood nearly every day. Located at Sunset Blvd and Western Ave, the lot was only a matter of a few blocks from from where Griffith shot much of Birth, and thus a few blocks (in the other direction) from the future location of the Harristorian Archives.

Dixon was a largely unsuccessful in the “business” as we call it here in Hollywood. In 1916, he directed The Fall of a Nation (hmmm….) that warned against pacifism, and several others based on his novels. His production company eventually went bust, and he moved on to other endeavors in 1926.

These days there are no traces of the former studio – just some East Hollywood sprawl. But if anyone out there has some images that they would like to share – send them on.

Screen Shot 2014-10-04 at 10.17.10 AM
Sunset and Western this morning – site of a future Target and a discount shoe store. Not much to get excited about.

With compliments,

Keith

A Word or Two about the Los Angeles Premiere of The Birth of a Nation

Screen shot 2014-03-25 at 2.39.01 PM

In February, 1915, The Clansman, later titled The Birth of a Nation premiered at the Clune’s Auditorium in Los Angeles (pictured above – now a parking lot). I want to say just a few words about 1) the public reaction and 2) how we think about this film today. Now, if you have been paying attention, you know that the film is as racist as it can be. For example, there are scenes depicting shoeless black people dancing, eating chicken, and leering at white women while serving in the South Carolina legislature during Reconstruction. If that’s not enough – there are plenty of scenes of blacks lusting after white women (who have to kill themselves to avoid being raped).

By our standards, this film is an easy target. But the usual analysis by film historians is pretty flat. It goes something like this: Yes – the film is racist but innovative at the same time. D. W. Griffith set the bar for future film makers…blah blah blah. How much longer are film scholars going to keep blathering on about the same old stuff?

Scholars of Civil War history have looked at this film too. Some of them (myself NOT included) have noted that the film was met across the (white) nation with a sort of general acceptance. White people (North and South) in 1915 seemed to agree that Reconstruction was a bad deal for the South and that blacks should have been kept in their places. Thus, these white people could relate to the “heroic” KKK in the film’s climax.

One reviewer at the 1915 LA premiere made a note of it. The audience applauded at scenes of whites triumphing over blacks attempting to assert their rights.

As modern observers, we have a tendency to recognize the widespread racism existing in 1915 and believe that most white people would get on board with the film’s message. After all – The Birth of a Nation was a tremendous success all over the country – not just in the South.

But that may not be exactly right. Sure, white northerners were certainly racists by our standards but that didn’t mean they supported the Confederate cause or the white South after the fact. Only 50 years earlier loyal citizens of the United States had fought a war to suppress a rebellion and the degeneration of law and order that the Confederate cause had represented. A film about mob rule was not necessarily a welcome thing. And just to add fuel to the fire, some of these guys who had shouldered muskets for the Union were still around to vent their anger!

And their legacy was still around too. Members of Union veterans’ organizations like the GAR made sure that US citizens knew what that war had been about. And they were not about to let a Confederate interpretation take hold that easily.

With compliments,

Keith